This Easter weekend Lydia and I watched these two dvd's:
We finally decided to watch Mel Gibson's
The Passion of the Christ - not on Good Friday, but on Easter Sunday (I wasn't looking forward to the bloody scenes...) .
On Monday night, 'second Easter day' in the Netherlands, we watched
Luther (the site is temporarily offline, but there is plenty of information available if you use
Google).
The
Passion of the Christ is an impressive movie, but I have seen too much blood and cruelty in this film. Mel Gibson did an excellent job as a movie maker, but he emphasized the violent torture of Jesus to such an extreme that I had to look away several times during the film.
I have an objection against the scene in the garden of Gethsemane (where Jesus prayed to his Father in anguish: ‘My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me; yet not what I want but what you want’). In this scene Jesus gets up and crushes the snake’s head with his heel, dramatizing Genesis 3:14, 15 (So the LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, you will be punished. You are singled out from all the domestic and wild animals of the whole earth to be cursed. You will grovel in the dust as long as you live, crawling along on your belly. From now on, you and the woman will be enemies, and your offspring and her offspring will be enemies. He will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.”) I do feel that this dramatic addition to the written account is 'allowed', but I don't agree with Mel Gibson's decision to include Satan in this particular scene (or a person representing the presence of evil). The Bible says that
an angel from heaven appeared to Jesus and strengthened him. (Luke 22:43). I don't believe that Satan or a demon was there at the same time... Jesus went to this garden to be alone with his Father!

My biggest question is: why didn't Mel Gibson show more of the life and preaching of Christ and less of his suffering and death? For me it is a disappointment that there were only a couple of flash backs showing scenes from Jesus' life and preaching. It seems to me that Gibson is obsessed with the
physical suffering of Christ. Jesus suffered a cruel death, no question about it, but his
spiritual suffering must have been far worse! Jesus' best friends left him and at the cross even his heavenly Father was nowhere to be found... (He asked his Father: “Why have you forsaken me?”). Physically Jesus was completely exhausted, but his spiritual power never left him. He still had the strength to forgive a condemned criminal and He asked forgiveness for the very people that crucified him: “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.”

I do want to believe that Mel Gibson had the noblest intentions with this film, but I don't think that he succeeded in showing WHY Jesus had to suffer and die on a cross. Only Jesus, being the perfect Son of God in human flesh, was able to pay for the sin of mankind. He predicted his own death and resurrection. His life, death and resurrection were absolutely unique and I think that Mel Gibson failed to explain why Jesus' passion was much more than a cruel crime against a wise Jewish rabbi. Thousands of people were crucified during the reign of Roman emperors. But there was only one blameless lamb that took away our sins at the cross on Golgotha: Jesus Christ, my Saviour.
The Passion of the Christ may have given many people the chance to discover the Jesus of the Gospels and that is something to be gratefull for. I do hope and pray that all these viewers will start reading the gospel accounts of Jesus' life in the Bible, because I believe that these written testimonies are still much better than any film ever made!
(I will also write about the Luther film - please bear with me!)